Category Archives: politics

Of Obama and Operating Excellently

//Time capsule post… it was sitting in my drafts for sometime. Finally managed to publish it.

The other day I was engaged in a conversation with a friend who believes that Obama’s decision to evolve towards a leaner military is a wrong one. He, much like the Republican Presidential candidates, spoke in vague and abstract terms of why the decision is bad – it will weaken America… we need to support our military… military spending is a sign of strength…

In all fairness, the only specific point that was mentioned: China is rising. Okay, I will concede that point. But there are other types of spending like infrastructure, research and education that China seems to be managing better than us. Why not talk about that as well…?

I am no military expert… the closest I have gotten to being in a military is being in a school bus that used to drop a colonel’s daughter at her home in a military cantonment (yeah!). Having said that, using context and relativity as my guide -here’s why I think the idea is a brilliant and a necessary one:

I work for a large public university that is current undergoing a system-wide exercise called: operational excellence… (I have also heard it being called “about time”). The impetus and the goal is similar to what the reduced military spending debate is about: less money, hence more efficiency. There is well placed criticism from those who are opposed it, skepticism from those who say they’ve seen this in the past, and premature exuberance from those who think this is the greatest thing since the Stanford band celebrated a little too early… =)

It is too early to call OE a success, and then there are days the process comes across as counter-intuitive… but, I’m supportive of the goal: making college education affordable for all. And this can only happen if the university is able to reduce its operating costs.

Similarly, (I was going to bring it back) security at home requires us to divert more capital towards domestic needs and for this we will need to reduce our military expenditure. It is simply a matter of priorities… if we had unlimited resources, then by all means spend on everything and anything that will give us the perception of being safe and prosperous. But the hard truth is, just like my employer, America will need to prioritize.

And investing towards a future that we will all share has to be that priority.

innovation.gov

Fareed Zakaria mentioned the White House Innovation White Paper on his show today… and I was surprised: the white house has a white paper on innovation?! Maybe, that is the Republican/libertarian in me. I expect such white papers to come out of the “Jobs, Gates and Alliances Inc.” industry. I do not expect the government to play a significant role in innovation…

Zakaria went on to elaborate areas of innovation that the government has spurned:

– without the Department of Defense there would be no semi-conductor industry

– NASA was a key buyer of the nascent computer industry

– DARPA invented the internet (sorry Al Gore fans, but that is one of those inconvenient truths)

– it was the military that spawned the use of GPS, way before there was an “app for that”

and that got me thinking, the government does have a role, and a specific role to play in the innovation economy – it is supposed to and should provide a climate for innovation. Not innovation itself, but the climate for innovation:

-a tax structure that facilitates business spending

-investment/spending (depending on if you are a democrat/republican) on research and education (and yes making sure that research is happening on an “operationally excellent” basis)

Singapore spends 6.9% of its budget on innovation – matching that would mean we will have to spend close to $700 billion on innovation climate. We can borrow that from the Chinese, right?! They love giving us money..! Well borrowing $700 billion for innovation climate spending is better than borrowing money from China to fund tax rebates that give $600 to most people (sorry Warren Buffet – you missed out) to spend on Walmart items made in China!

So I guess, by now, I have ideologically left the Republican camp and am on the other side… but practical solutions calls for pragmatism, that does not believe in ideology whose time has come and gone, but in solutions that work. Treating political parties as sports teams is silly… The times are changing and we are still having debates that are based in ideology and are conducted by mostly loud fundamentalist leaders, who are able to get away with euphemisms and political commentators, that take refuge in esoteric concepts…

So, just like Zakaria and other don’t-have-a-team people,  I am hoping that President will outline an agenda, that focusses on long term sustainable growth and how we can keep continue to file the most number of patents than any other country out there.

(btw – “China accounted for more than two-thirds of all cleantech IPOs in 2010 – 63 out of 93 launches globally, including 8 of the 10 biggest IPOs.”)

And on the 101st Day…

The President rested.

Not really. On his 101st day as the President of US of A, Barack Obama probably woke up and went about his day doing what he has been doing for the previous 100 days – fixing the mess left by the Bush bunch. So I do not quite understand this pause to smell the roses or this desire by the media to give the President a grade on what are not even his mid terms… so while the media celebrated/vilified (depending on if you were watching MSNBC or Fox News) the first 100 days of Barack Obama, I choose to do something different. I am marking his 101st as the President.

What about the grade you ask? Well I give him an “Incomplete.”

But what I am going to do, more for me than for those reading this blog post is to express my impressions of this young Presidency.

Or let’s KISS – keep it simple stupid and let me jot down the keywords/meta-tags I associate with the object: President Barack Hussein Obama after the first 101 days in office:

Tags: pragmatic, calm, soothing, appeaser, conciliatory, smart, able, athletic, young, promising, deliberate, upbeat, anti-Bush, spender, borrower, articulate, charming, wise, presidential, husband, cool, promising, future, cunning, media-savvy, professorial, comfortable, leader, nerd, leftie, lefty, humble, web 2.0, engaged, engaging, father, writer, thinker, disciplined, politician, philanthropic, daring, brave, democrat, thoughtful, historic, witty, intellectual, thank God he is not Sarah Palin

This by no means is exhaustive… and I am sure more tags will get added as the days goes by. It has been a decent start: I am very happy about certain approaches like the foreign policy and not so happy about others like his fixes for the banking sector.

We definitely needed a change in the words we spoke to the world, and the way we spoke those words. Obama brings that very refreshing change of humility (“If you’re ahead, shut up and stay ahead”) and a conciliatory tone. To some it may seem a weakness, but to me it is a sign of strength. It takes a secure man and a nation to admit his/its faults. I loved the town hall meeting he had with young students in Turkey.

As far as the banking sector is concerned, I tend to trust scientists when it comes to science, doctors when it comes to medicine and economists when it comes to economics… and economists seem to believe that a temporary qausi-nationalization would have been the more painful but quicker solution to the crisis. Barack Obama is a politician and no where it is more apparent than in his approach to the auto-industry and the banking sector.

But, as I said, it has been a decent start Mr. President – you are Reagenesque in behavioral economics, Roseveltic in long term solutions and Clintonesque in articulation of those solutions.

Yep – decent start.